Page 59 - Radiography Flipbook

Example Assessment Plan Bachelor’s Level- Communication Goal

Goal 1– Students will demonstrate the ability to communicate effectively.
Student Measurement Timeframe – Benchmark Actual Data Past 3 – 5 years
Learning Tools – A formative Should be a score Results of Data Results –
Outcomes A minimum of 2 measure used above passing. Include the Identify each
measuring (while students Examples are: number of year’s results
tools/assessment are in the first A percentage score, students separately for
methods per student year of the A score based on a evaluated comparison
learning outcome is program), and a scale, such as a Likert purposes.
required. summative score (include the
measure used scale)
(when students
are close to
program
completion
and/or graduates)
is recommended
for best practices.
1.1 Students will RADT 225 Program 100% of students n= 21 2020: 3.95
communicate Semester 2 will receive a 4 out mean: 3.95 2019: 3.76
effectively as a Clinical Preceptor of 5 or higher range: 2.0 – 2018: 3.85
part of the Evaluation 5.0 2017: 4.19
healthcare team. (Question #9 – 2016: 3.55
Patient 2.0= 1
Communication) 3.0= 3
4.0= 13
5.0= 4
RADT 333 Program 100% of students n= 18 2020: 9.4
Semester 4 will receive at least 8 mean: 9.4 2019: 8.9
Interprofessional out of 10 or higher range: 8-10 2018: 8.2
Lab Simulation
Rubric 8= 2
(Question #3) 9= 7
10= 9
1.2 Students will RADT 350 Program 100% of students n= 18 2020: 84.1
demonstrate the Semester 3 will receive a score mean: 84.1 2019: 82.9
ability to Research Paper of 85 or better range: 72-98 2018: 77.6
communicate 2017: 78.7
through written 5 students 2016: 79.0
correspondence scored under
pertaining to an 85
healthcare. (72, 77, 80,
81, 84)
RADT 412 Program 100% of students n= 18 2020: 88.4
Semester 4 will receive a score mean: 88.4 2019: 88.1
Case Study of 85 or better range: 82-100 2 2018: 82.3
Management Project students scored 2017: 85.4
under 85 (78 & 2016: 81.9
82)

Student Learning Outcome 1.1
Analysis: The results of the 1.1 SLO is showing that our students have strong communication skills. 17 out of 21
students in the class received an “above average” or “excellent” rating on their Clinical Preceptor Evaluation regarding
patient communication for Clinic II. 3 students received a rating of “average” and one student received a rating of “below
average.” The goal was 4.0 and the class as a whole scored an average of 3.95. This is the student’s second semester of
being in clinic, and the student’s ability to communicate is expected to continually increase as they progress through the