Page 143 - JRCERT Update Articles
P. 143

JRCERT Update

          Ensuring Student Safety in Magnetic Resonance Education Programs





          room and into the magnet, causing severe trauma to   Table
          the child’s head.  This tragedy highlighted the need   Magnetic Resonance (MR) Safety Zones 5
                        2
          to improve safety considerations in the MR envi-    Zone    Description
          ronment and emphasized the unmistakable need to
          improve safety measures for students in educational   I     Areas are freely accessible to the general public.
                                                                      S
          programs.                                           II      emirestricted area where patients and hospital
                                                                      staff can interact.
          Promoting Safe Practices and Improved                       Area must be marked clearly with a radiation
          Accountability                                              hazard safety sign.
            Reports of unsafe practices in the MR environ-    III     Area is physically restricted from the non-MR
          ment have pointed to a need for increased guidance on       personnel area.
                                                                      D
          safety practices. The American College of Radiology         oes not permit free access by unscreened,
          developed a guidance document to provide industry           non-MR personnel.
          standards for safe and responsible practices in MR          Must be free of any ferromagnetic objects and
          environments. The document is updated continually to        equipment that can be drawn into the magnet,
          reflect changes in MR imaging best practices. Emanuel       resulting in serious injury or death.
                                                                      T
          Kanal, MD, FACR, FISMRM, MRMD, AANG, the            IV      he MR suite itself.
                                                                      I
          lead author of the document, has developed an MR            ndividuals that have not been screened are not
          safety training course to promote the certification of      permitted to enter this zone under any circum-
          MR safety officers.  In addition, the Joint Commission      stance.
                          3
                                                                      A
          issued diagnostic imaging requirements that require         fter an appropriate screening process has taken
          organizations to manage safety and security risks           place, patients and hospital personnel can enter
          in MR environments. These requirements include              the MR suite but must be accompanied by
          restricting access to MR areas, ensuring these areas        designated MR staff.
          are controlled by MR safety-trained individuals, and
          posting signage to indicate the presence of potentially   dosimetry programs are required to establish a safety
          dangerous magnetic fields (see Table).  Furthermore,   screening protocol for all students who have access to
                                          4
                                                                               1
          the Joint Commission requires facilities to document   the MR environment.  To document compliance, the
          the ongoing education of MR personnel, including   program must describe how it prepares students for MR
          annual training on MR safe practices.              safe practices and provide a copy of the screening form.
                                                             A plethora of MR safety information and resources for
          New Standards Interpretations                      programs to use is available (see Box).
            In the JRCERT’s continual quest to promote qual-    As of the beginning of 2016, the JRCERT had
          ity and safety, new interpretations were adopted in   accredited 10 MR programs, with several more in the
          October 2014 for Standard Four of the JRCERT       accreditation process. All of these programs have pub-
          Standards for an Accredited Educational Program in   lished information about MR safety screening on their
          Magnetic Resonance, which deals with health and    program’s Web site; whereas, an informal review of non-
          safety to ensure the safety of students in educational   JRCERT accredited MR programs listed on the American
          programs for radiography, radiation therapy, MR, and   Registry of Radiologic Technologists Educational
          medical dosimetry.  The interpretations require MR   Programs Web site revealed that only 1 of 4 MR programs
                          6
          programs to publish and provide information about   have published information on their program’s Web site
                                                                                   7
          the potential dangers of implants or foreign bodies in   about MR safety screening.  This indicates the need for,
          students to all students and the general public, as well as   and value of, programmatic accreditation. Programmatic
          to establish a safety screening protocol for all students.   accreditation provides educational programs prepar-
          In addition, radiography, radiation therapy, and medical   ing new practitioners for the profession with an external



          562                                                   RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, May/June 2016, Volume 87, Number 5
          Reprinted with permission from the American Society of Radiologic Technologists for educational purposes. ©2019. All rights reserved.
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148