Page 72 - Radiography Flipbook

Example Assessment Plan - Communication Goal

Goal 1– Students will demonstrate the ability to communicate effectively.
Student Measurement Timeframe – Benchmark Actual Data Past 3 – 5 years
Learning Tools – A formative Should be a score Results of Data Results –
Outcomes A minimum of 2 measure used above passing. Include the Identify each
measuring (while students Examples are: number of year’s results
tools/assessment are in the first A percentage score, students separately for
methods per student year of the A score based on a evaluated comparison
learning outcome is program), and a scale, such as a Likert purposes.
required. summative score (include the
measure used scale)
(when students
are close to
program
completion
and/or graduates)
is recommended
for best practices.
1.1 Students will RADT 225 Program Students will receive n= 21 2020: 3.95
communicate Semester 2 a 4 out of 5 or higher mean: 3.95 2019: 3.76
effectively as a Clinical Preceptor range: 2.0 – 2018: 3.85
part of the Evaluation 5.0 2017: 4.19
healthcare team. (Question #9 – 2016: 3.55
Patient 2.0= 1
Communication) 3.0= 3
4.0= 13
5.0= 4
RADT 110 Program Students will receive n= 21 2020: 9.4
Semester 1 at least 8 out of 10 or mean: 9.3 2019: 8.9
Lab Simulation higher range: 8-10 2018: 8.2
Rubric
(Question #3) 8= 2
9= 10
10= 9
1.2 Students will RADT 220 Program Students will receive n= 21 2020: 84.1
demonstrate the Semester 2 a score of 85 or mean: 84.1 2019: 82.9
ability to Pathology Report better range: 72-98 2018: 77.6
communicate and Patient History 2017: 78.7
through written 5 students 2016: 79.0
correspondence scored under
pertaining to an 85
healthcare. (72, 77, 80,
81, 84)
RADT 230 Program Students will receive n= 21 2020: 88.4
Semester 2 a score of 85 or mean: 88.4 2019: 88.1
Case Study better range: 82-100 2 2018: 82.3
students scored 2017: 85.4
under 85 (78 & 2016: 81.9
82)

Student Learning Outcome 1.1
Analysis: The results of the 1.1 SLO is showing that our students have strong communication skills. 17 out of 21
students in the class received an “above average” or “excellent” rating on their Clinical Preceptor Evaluation regarding
patient communication for Clinic II. 3 students received a rating of “average” and one student received a rating of “below
average.” The goal was 4.0 and the class as a whole scored an average of 3.95. This is the student’s second semester of
being in clinic, and the students’ ability to communicate is expected to continually increase as they progress through the