Page 103 - JRCERT Update Articles
P. 103

JRCERT Update

          Data Analysis: Closing the Loop in Assessment





          data will not be beneficial, and no amount of analysis   significantly from the normal, expected data sets they
          will provide useful information.                   could be considered erroneous. An example might be
                                                             the rubric scores for a communications assignment. If,
          Data Collection and Analysis                       for example, the metric historically has yielded an aver-
            It is an assessment best practice to gather data for   age in the range of 3.0 to 3.5 on a 5-point scale, and this
          SLOs from several sources; this practice is known as   year’s cohort average score was 4.9, the educator likely
          triangulation. A laboratory performance exam that   would want to do some investigation and pose ques-
          demonstrates critical thinking, a clinical proficiency   tions to determine whether the raw data was collected,
          exam that requires critical thinking to complete the   scored, and entered appropriately. An outlier also might
          exam, and an employer evaluation of the graduate’s   be linked to a modification in the educational process,
          ability to think critically would be an excellent example   such as the implementation of a new textbook, use of a
          of triangulation. These multiple data points should   new faculty member, employment of a new method of
          provide a great deal of information over time to ensure   instruction, or student performance that falls signifi-
          that students have achieved the objective set by the   cantly above or below the cohort. The above examples
          program, or point to contradictory information that   emphasize the importance of evaluating the data in
          requires further investigation.                    context and incorporating qualitative information with
            Data analysis is not merely the restatement of the   the raw data.
          numbers collected, but rather is a determination of   While analyzing the data, it is important to maintain
          what the numbers represent. Box 2 identifies com-  a global and a detailed perspective. The global perspec-
          mon areas to be mindful of when analyzing data from   tive includes reviewing qualitative information that
          student learning assessment.  Data analysis begins   explains the raw data. It also involves stepping back
                                  2
          with a review of “cleansed” data—data that has been   and looking at the data over time, a practice known
          purged of outliers. Outliers are data points that veer so   as longitudinal trend analysis. Rarely should educators

           Box 2
           Common Data Analysis Errors 2
           Using meaningless   Be sure to measure student learning. A course grade that includes points for attendance does not indicate the
           metrics and tools  extent to which a student has learned and applied effective critical thinking skills.
           Data overload    Too many metrics is a common error; sometimes less is more. Only collect data that provides insight into
                            student success. Unnecessary data collection often leads to frustration, and thorough analysis does not occur
                            because assessment becomes compliance reporting.
           Not cleaning up   Always assume the data is inaccurate at first. Once you get familiar with it, you will start to feel when something
           messy data       is not right.
           Ignoring outliers  Outliers in data can indicate that something is wrong, such as a process not working. Investigate outliers in the
                            data to make sure nothing is seriously wrong.
           Fixating on outliers  Although outliers should not be ignored, do not focus on them and ignore everything else. For example, do
                            not make program changes based on a single poor data point.
           Not watching metrics  Qualitative data is important to make sure the quantitative data are analyzed in context. For example, scores
           in context       might be lower than normal because of recent curriculum revisions.
           Not using trend data  Look at data results over time and cohorts. Do not make significant changes based on poor data results from
                            a single year or cohort. Conversely, do not continue to monitor for several cycles or fail to develop action plans
                            when data reveal decreasing results.
           Assessing new action  When closing the loop in the assessment cycle, it is vital to continue to measure and assess the effectiveness of
           plans            any action plan or changes that have been implemented.



          546                                                   RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, May/June 2017, Volume 88, Number 5
          Reprinted with permission from the American Society of Radiologic Technologists for educational purposes. ©2019. All rights reserved.
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108