Page 73 - Medical Dosimetry Flipbook

Example Assessment Plan and Analysis-Master’s Level Critical Thinking Goal

Goal – Students will develop and apply effective critical thinking skills.
Student Measurement Timeframe – Benchmark Actual Data Past 3 – 5 years of Data
Learning Tools – A formative – Results - Results –
Outcomes A minimum of 2 measure used Should be a Include the number Identify each year’s results
– measuring (while students score above of students separately for comparison
tools/assessment are in the first passing. evaluated purposes.
methods per year of the Examples
student learning program), and are:
outcome is a summative A percentage
required. measure used score,
(when students A score
are close to based on a
program scale, such as
completion a Likert score
and/or (include the
graduates) is scale)
recommended
for best
practices.
1. Students Simulation error Semester 3 Students will 2021 (Year) 2020 9.04 n = 10
will correct evaluation receive a 2019 9.30 n = 8
treatment grading form score ≥ 8.5 Average = 8.9 2018 8.80 n = 8
errors. Items # 2 - 4 (average (average score for 2017 8.2 n = 8
score for cohort) 2016 8.70 n = 9
cohort)
(on a 10- n = 9/9

point scale) (number of
students who met
benchmark/number
of students who
completed
assignment)
Treatment error Semester 5 Students will 2021 2020 9.34 n =10
competency receive a 2019 9.30 n = 8
evaluation form score ≥ 9.0 Average = 9.2 2018 8.80 n = 8
Items # 1 - 10 (on a 10- 2017 9.33 n = 8
point scale) n = 8/9 2016 9.70 n = 9

2. Students Laboratory Semester 3 Students will 2021 2020 8.40 n =10
will assignment form receive a 2019 8.20 n = 8
develop Items # 9 & 10 score ≥ 8.0 Average = 8.5 2018 8.53 n = 8
optimal (on a 10- 2017 7.41 n = 8
treatment point scale) n = 8/9 2016 8.70 n = 9
strategies.

Laboratory Final Semester 5 Students will 2021 2020 9.05 n = 10
evaluation form receive a 2019 9.7 n = 8
Item # 10 score ≥ 9.0 Average= 8.9 2018 9.65 n = 8
(on a 10- 2017 8.73 n = 8
point scale) n = 7/9 2016 8.90 n = 9