Page 76 - Radiation Therapy Flipbook

Example Assessment Plan and Analysis-Associate Level Critical Thinking Goal

Goal – Students will develop and apply effective critical thinking skills.
Student Measurement Timeframe – Benchmark Actual Data Past 3 – 5 years of Data
Learning Tools – A formative – Results - Results –
Outcomes – A minimum of measure used Should be a Include the number Identify each year’s results
2 measuring (while score above of students separately for comparison
tools/assessment students are passing. evaluated purposes.
methods per in the first Examples
student learning year of the are:
outcome is program), and A
required. a summative percentage
measure used score,
(when A score
students are based on a
close to scale, such
program as a Likert
completion score
and/or (include the
graduates) is scale)
recommended
for best
practices.
1. Students will Clinical Semester 3 Students 2021 (Year) 2020 9.04 n = 10
recognize/resolve evaluation will receive 2019 9.30 n = 8
discrepancies in grading form a score ≥ Average = 8.9 2018 8.80 n = 8
patient set-up. Items # 6 - 8 8.5 (average (average score for 2017 8.2 n = 8
score for cohort) 2016 8.70 n = 9
cohort)
(on a 10- n = 9/9
point scale) (number of
students who met
benchmark/number
of students who
completed
assignment)
Clinical Semester 5 Students 2021 2020 9.34 n =10
competency will receive 2019 9.30 n = 8
evaluation form a score ≥ Average = 9.2 2018 8.80 n = 8
Items # 1 - 10 9.0 2017 9.33 n = 8
(on a 10- n = 8/9 2016 9.70 n = 9
point scale)

2. Students will Image critique Semester 3 Students 2021 2020 8.40 n =10
adjust treatment assignment will receive 2019 8.20 n = 8
parameters based (laboratory) a score ≥ Average = 8.5 2018 8.53 n = 8
on imaging. Items # 9 & 10 8.0 2017 7.41 n = 8
(on a 10- n = 8/9 2016 8.70 n = 9
point scale)

Clinical Semester 5 Students 2021 2020 9.05 n = 10
evaluation form will receive 2019 9.7 n = 8
Item # 10 a score ≥ Average= 8.9 2018 9.65 n = 8
9.0 2017 8.73 n = 8
(on a 10- n = 7/9 2016 8.90 n = 9
point scale)