Page 77 - Radiation Therapy Flipbook
P. 77

Analysis – To include key findings, 3-5 year trending comparisons, steps to take to enhance student learning:
         Critical Thinking Goal, SLO 1:  It is noted that the patient set-up (discrepancies) data was slightly lower this year.  It
         could be an anomaly; however, a new faculty member was recently hired and they implemented changes to the evaluation
         criteria. The slight decrease could be a result of students adjusting to the change in methods.  The discussion also
         included concerns that these students seemed a little more intimidated with determining that a discrepancy existed.
         SLO 2:  The second-year students were at benchmark.  It is interesting to note that the first-year students were above
         benchmark in this area.  Feedback from the students and input from the clinical preceptors indicate that more image
         critique with treatment adjustment assignments might be helpful.

         Action Plan based on Analysis:
         SLO 1:  Based on the discussion points, we will add more clinical exercises with smaller groups so every student has
         more one-on-one practice time and then reassess next year.
         SLO 2:  We will implement an image critique assignment into each upper level clinical course.  It will include instructor
         presentations along with student assignments.  In addition, the students will be required to successfully complete 5 image
         critiques involving treatment adjustments as part of the clinical grade.  The clinical instructors will review the critiques
         with the students based on the mentoring/training and rubric from the clinical coordinator to ensure all the clinical
         preceptors understand the expectations for the reviews prior to implementation.  We will reassess the changes and the
         impact on the students’ skill level.

         Results/Improvement(s) noted based on the action plans that were implemented:
         SLO 1:  Based on feedback from the students and the clinical preceptors, the one-on-one extra practice time seemed to
         improve the students’ confidence levels and there was a noticed improvement in their critical thinking skills.  We will
         continue to keep the smaller groups and the extra practice time since there was such a noticeable improvement.
         SLO 2:  There has been a slight improvement in this area with the students.  However, it did not have the impact that was
         hoped for.  We will consider additional methods for improving student skills in this area.  One idea that came from our
         discussions with the advisory board members was to have the second-year students give image critique with treatment
         adjustment presentations to the first-year students.  It may benefit them and lead to greater understanding if they have to
         lead the instruction/teach it.  We will implement this in 2022 and reassess its impact.

         Re-evaluation Date:  Fall 2023 at the next assessment committee meeting.











         Click HERE for a blank template.
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82