Page 75 - Magnetic Resonance Flipbook

be to have the clinical preceptors evaluate the second-year students to obtain more consistent inter-rater reliability. This will be
analyzed again next year with feedback from the clinical preceptors.
Goal I, SLO 2: The results for the second-year students for 2021 did not meet the benchmark of 90, but was close with an average of
88, and overall has shown an increase since 2017. These are very positive since the action plans were implemented in 2016. It may be
time for a new benchmark, this will be considered for the Fall 2023 cohort with the new incoming students and will continue to be
evaluated.

Action Plan based on Analysis: Increase the benchmark for Goal I, SLO 2 for the first-year students to 8.5 from 8.0.
Re-evaluation Date: Fall 2022 at the next assessment committee meeting.

Results/Improvement(s) noted based on the action plans that were implemented: It was reiterated that in 2016, a new process for
evaluating students was implemented. Supervising technologists and clinical preceptors attend a workshop where simulated
competencies and evaluations take place. Discussion occurs so evaluators are grading consistently and providing constructive
feedback to the students immediately. Additionally, students were required to complete more simulations in the laboratory setting
prior to attempting in the clinical setting. They are also required to have a minimum of three completions of an exam before
performing a competency examination. This is reinforced by the department managers who stated the new graduates are obtaining
excellent MR images and their repeat rates are slightly lower than some of the experienced technologists.

Click HERE for a blank template.